amiodel beta
betaA dedicated amiodel mode with result settings and one shared sequence of further operations in Studio.
amiodel product dataFour 3D generation models in one Studio
Compare current versions, input data, and result settings. amiodel capabilities and published figures with their sources are shown separately below.
- amiodel betabeta01
- 3D.Hunyuan 3.13.1 · 16.01.202602
- Tripo H3.1H3.1 · v3.1-2026021103
- Meshy 7.17.1 · 10.09.202604
Current versions without a hidden ranking
Every model has the same place in the selector. The descriptions record its purpose and verified settings instead of assigning a subjective first place.
3D.Hunyuan 3.1
3.1 · 16.01.2026Multi-view generation with additional top, bottom, and diagonal views.
Tencent Cloud documentationTripo H3.1
H3.1 · v3.1-20260211High-detail geometry, PBR materials, and a separate Ultra Geometry mode.
Tripo H3.1 documentationMeshy 7.1
7.1 · 10.09.2026A Meshy release focused on fine geometric detail and Ultra 4K mode.
Meshy 7.1 announcementSelection settings in amiodel
This comparison covers result settings in Studio, not every capability of the developers’ external services.
- Input images
- 1 image · up to 8 views
- Geometry settings
- 3,000–1,500,000 polygons
- PBR materials
- Separate setting
- After generation
- 3D viewing · rig · animation · export
- Input images
- 1 image · up to 8 views
- Geometry settings
- 3,000–1,500,000 polygons
- PBR materials
- Separate setting
- After generation
- 3D viewing · rig · animation · export
- Input images
- 1 image · up to 4 views
- Geometry settings
- 10,000–1,500,000 · Ultra up to 2,000,000
- PBR materials
- Included
- After generation
- 3D viewing · rig · animation · export
- Input images
- 1 image · up to 4 views
- Geometry settings
- 10,000–300,000 polygons in amiodel
- PBR materials
- Included
- After generation
- 3D viewing · rig · animation · export
Published detail benchmark
On September 10, 2026, Meshy published its Detail Richness test. It measures the share of the visible surface where geometry orientation changes noticeably within a single pixel.
Meshy 7.153.5%
Tripo 3.144.8%
Hunyuan3D 3.139.4%
Meshy 7.137.4%
Tripo 3.129.5%
Hunyuan3D 3.125.4%
Meshy 7.123.1%
Tripo 3.117.3%
Hunyuan3D 3.114.7%
What was compared
Meshy states that each model used its highest available settings and uncompressed geometry.
What the metric shows
Only the density of geometric surface detail at three render resolutions.
What it does not prove
Shape accuracy, texture quality, topology, speed, cost, or suitability for a specific project.
This is a vendor benchmark from Meshy, not an independent amiodel study. The source publication does not include amiodel beta, so we do not assign it a value from another method.
Choose for the task, not by one number
A practical guide to version differences. Always inspect the final model in the 3D scene using your own source image.
amiodel beta
One amiodel workflow
Choose the dedicated amiodel mode when you want to complete the entire process in one interface, from generation settings to viewing and later operations.
3D.Hunyuan 3.1
More source views
Up to eight views help convey sides of the object that are missing from one image.
Tripo H3.1
Dense geometry
Ultra Geometry raises the upper result limit to two million polygons.
Meshy 7.1
Fine surface detail
The official 7.1 release focuses on geometric relief and details visible at close range.
Questions about 3D generation models
01Which 3D generation models are in amiodel?
Studio includes four options: amiodel beta, 3D.Hunyuan 3.1, Tripo H3.1, and Meshy 7.1. They are in the same Create tab and share one workflow for the result.
02Which model is best for creating 3D from an image?
There is no universal winner: the choice depends on source views, required geometry density, materials, and the object itself. The published test below measures only geometric detail richness and does not assess the whole result.
03What changed in Meshy 7.1?
According to Meshy’s official announcement, version 7.1 improves fine geometric details and adds Ultra 4K with an internal geometry resolution of 4096³. This claim and benchmark come from Meshy itself.
04How many views does 3D.Hunyuan 3.1 accept?
Tencent’s official API accepts a primary image and up to seven additional views: left, right, back, top, bottom, and two front diagonal views.
05Can models be compared only by polygon count?
No. Polygon count describes mesh density but does not by itself prove shape accuracy, texture quality, topology, or correspondence to the source image.
06Where can I view the finished result?
After generation, the version appears in amiodel Assets. Open and rotate it in the 3D scene, then continue with rigging, animation, or export.
Compare models using your own image
Open the Create tab, choose a model, and check the settings and cost before launch.